AI workflows for revenue teams
Placeholder house ad for Conservus.ai. Swap with final creative when brand assets are ready.
Partner with Conservus.aiLatest Cases & Updates
Rights explainers, case coverage, and defense-oriented reporting.
Colorado Expands Its Domestic Violence Definition on August 12: Monitoring, Isolation, and Financial Control Now Count in Custody Cases
Colorado's HB26-1309 takes effect August 12, 2026, broadening what counts as domestic violence in separation and custody cases. Here is what actually changed, and why it lives in family court rather than the criminal code.
The Fine Print That Waives Your Appeal Can Now Be Torn Up: In Hunter v. United States the Supreme Court Says a Plea Deal Can't Lock In a 'Miscarriage of Justice'
On June 18, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that a federal plea deal's appeal waiver cannot be enforced when doing so would leave an egregious, system-discrediting error in place. Here is what the miscarriage-of-justice standard covers, what it still bars, and what it means for anyone who signed away their right to appeal.
'They Catch Everybody': A New National Investigation Says Roadside Sobriety Tests Fail Sober Drivers, and Courts Are Listening
A multi-year, 22-state investigation and a 2023 randomized trial reach the same uncomfortable conclusion: roadside sobriety tests are good enough to justify an arrest but too unreliable to prove impairment in court. Here is what the tests measure, why sober people fail, and how defense lawyers are fighting the results.
In Mississippi, a Gun Doesn't Have to Be Fired, or Even Used, to Send a 13-Year-Old to Adult Court
A new Mississippi law routes children as young as 13 directly into circuit court when a firearm is present during a violent crime. The weapon does not have to be fired or even used. Here is what SB 2710 changes and who it sweeps in.
Six Jurors, Not Twelve: The Supreme Court Just Agreed to Decide Whether Florida-Style Juries Are Unconstitutional
On June 15, 2026, the Supreme Court agreed to decide in Kian v. Florida whether a serious felony can be tried by a six-person jury, teeing up a challenge to a 56-year-old precedent. Here is what it means for pending trials, plea deals, and old convictions in the six states that still seat sub-12 juries.
The Sentencing Credit for Fixing Your Life Before Sentencing: The Commission Floated It, Then Left It Out of the November 1 Rules
A first-of-its-kind federal guideline would have rewarded documented rehabilitation before sentencing. The U.S. Sentencing Commission proposed Section 3E1.2 in December 2025, then declined to adopt it on April 16, 2026. Here is what it would have done, why it stalled, and what actually changed for white-collar defendants on November 1.
Pennsylvania Just Invented a New DUI Crime That Turns Your Old ARD Into a Prior Offense
A 2025 win for Pennsylvania DUI defendants lasted less than seven months. After the state Supreme Court ruled in Commonwealth v. Shifflett that a prior ARD acceptance could not be used to enhance a DUI sentence, lawmakers responded with Act 58 of 2025, creating a brand-new offense at 75 Pa.C.S. 3802(h) that charges a fresh DUI as a second offense if you completed ARD within the past 10 years.
The Hemp Gummy in Your Cabinet Becomes a Schedule I Drug on November 12: The Federal Ban That Recriminalizes Most of the Market
A hemp gummy that is legal today can become a Schedule I controlled substance on November 12, 2026. A one-year fuse lit by H.R. 5371 rewrites the federal definition of hemp and pushes delta-8, THCA flower, and most edibles back under the drug laws. Here is what changed, who is exposed, and what survives.
The Sentencing Guidelines Just Swept 'Fentanyl-Related Substances' Into the Drug Quantity Table, and It Takes Effect November 1
The scheduling fight over fentanyl analogues got the headlines. The quieter change is the one that decides actual prison time: on November 1, 2026, the U.S. Sentencing Commission's amendment adds 'fentanyl-related substance' to the Drug Quantity Table with a rebuttable presumption that shifts the burden to the defense.
Virginia Started Sealing Convictions for the First Time in Its History on July 1: What Actually Went Live and Who Qualifies
On July 1, 2026, Virginia began sealing criminal convictions for the first time ever. Here is the eligibility map: what seals automatically, what requires a petition, and why 'sealed' still is not a blank slate.
For the First Time in U.S. History, a Federal Conviction Can Be Erased: The Trafficking Survivors Relief Act Opens the Door
The Trafficking Survivors Relief Act, signed into law in January 2026, is the first federal statute to authorize expungement of a federal criminal record. Here is what it does, who qualifies, and why it matters far beyond trafficking cases.
The Supreme Court's Chatrie Ruling Turns Google 'Geofence' Warrants Into a Search, and Into a New Suppression Argument
On June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court held 6-3 in Chatrie v. United States that a geofence warrant compelling your phone's Location History is a Fourth Amendment search. That opens a suppression argument in drug, robbery, and burglary cases built on Google location dragnets. It does not guarantee one, because the good-faith exception still stands in the way.
An Algorithm Can Help Arrest You and Never Show Up in Your Case File: Maryland Forces Disclosure as Virginia Bans Real-Time Tracking July 1
A facial recognition match can put you under arrest without ever appearing in your discovery file. Maryland now forces prosecutors to disclose it, Virginia bans real-time tracking on July 1, and a federal bill wants a warrant first. Here is what it means for your defense.
The .05 Blood-Alcohol Line Is Spreading: Washington Eyed a July Cutover, and Utah Is No Longer the Only Bill on the Table
Washington's Senate voted to drop the DUI threshold from .08 to .05 before the 2026 bill died in the House. Utah still stands alone in enforcement, but a growing list of states is pushing the same number. Here is what a .05 limit actually means for drivers and their defense.
The Meth 'Purity Loophole' That Doubles Federal Sentences Survives: The Reform the Sentencing Commission Proposed, Then Quietly Shelved
A widely expected fix to federal methamphetamine sentencing was proposed in December 2025 and then dropped at the Commission's April 2026 meeting without explanation. The 'actual vs. mixture' purity split does not disappear on November 1. Here is what was on the table, why it matters, and what still stands.
Half of Sober Drivers Fail the Roadside Marijuana Test: Why Courts Are Starting to Throw Out Cannabis DUI Field Evidence
A UC San Diego clinical trial found trained officers rated nearly half of sober placebo participants as impaired on roadside sobriety tests. Defense attorneys are now using that number to challenge cannabis DUI arrests.
The Broken Taillight Stop Is Dying: Los Angeles Moves to Ban Pretextual Traffic Stops, and It Changes How Drug and Gun Cases Begin
On May 6, 2026, the Los Angeles City Council voted 14-0 to move toward barring the LAPD from making pretextual traffic stops for minor, non-safety violations. Here is what the vote actually does, why the Whren doctrine still controls the courtroom, and why breaking the new rule usually will not get drug or gun evidence thrown out in California.
Two DUIs and You Lose Your Guns: Washington's Top Court Upholds Recidivist Disarmament Law 5-4 in McLellan v. Brown
In a 5-4 decision, the Washington Supreme Court upheld RCW 9.41.040, which bars firearm possession for people with two or more DUI-type convictions within seven years. The court held the state can categorically disarm repeat DUI offenders without any individualized finding of dangerousness. A four-justice dissent called it preemptive disarmament.
Convicted of Domestic Assault in Virginia? You Now Have 24 Hours to Hand Over Every Gun You Own
As of July 1, 2026, a misdemeanor domestic assault conviction in Virginia starts a 24-hour clock to surrender every firearm you own. Here is what triggers the duty, the step-by-step deadlines, the federal trap that state law cannot fix, and the narrow paths back to your rights.
The Supreme Court Just Narrowed the Feds' Power to Take Your Gun Over Marijuana: What U.S. v. Hemani Actually Decided
In United States v. Hemani, the Supreme Court unanimously threw out a Texas man's conviction for owning a gun while using marijuana. But the win is narrow and fact-specific, not a facial repeal of the federal drug-user gun ban. Here is what the ruling changes, what it leaves untouched, and what a cannabis-using gun owner should and should not conclude.
The Fraud Sentencing Overhaul Almost No White Collar Defendant Knows About: On November 1 the Federal Loss Table Collapses From 16 Tiers to 8
On November 1, 2026 the federal guideline that drives most fraud, embezzlement, tax, and insider-trading sentences gets its biggest rewrite in years. The loss table drops from 16 tiers to 8, dollar thresholds rise, and the change is not retroactive. Here is what it means for anyone facing an economic crime charge.
Your Criminal Record Could Seal Itself, No Lawyer and No Petition Required: The Automatic Clean Slate Wave Reaching Pennsylvania, Illinois and Beyond in 2026
Automatic record sealing is spreading across the country in 2026. Virginia's Clean Slate law takes effect July 1, and roughly 13 states plus D.C. now seal eligible records with no application. Here is what auto-sealing covers, why sealed is not the same as expunged, and the steps to take in your state.
Your First DUI Now Means an In-Car Breathalyzer in 34 States: The 2026 Interlock Expansion (and Washington's New 15-Year Lookback)
For most of the country, a first DUI conviction now points toward an ignition interlock device rather than a flat license suspension. Here is what is actually mandatory, what California's 2026 law really changed, and why Washington's new 15-year lookback targets repeat offenders, not first-timers.
Medical Marijuana Just Became Schedule III While Everything Else Stays With Heroin: The Split That Goes on Trial at the DEA's June 29 Hearing
On April 28, 2026, the federal government split marijuana in two. FDA-approved products and state-licensed medical cannabis dropped to Schedule III, while recreational, bulk, and unlicensed marijuana stayed in Schedule I next to heroin. A DEA hearing opening June 29 will test whether that line holds. Here is what it means if you are facing charges.
Rutherford v. United States Slams the Compassionate Release Door on Stacked Gun Sentences
On May 28, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the 18-year gap between Daniel Rutherford's 32-year stacked gun sentence and the 14-year term Congress later set is not an 'extraordinary and compelling reason' for release. Here is what the decision forecloses, and the narrow paths that remain.
Karen Read Walked on Murder but Lost on DUI: Why the Conviction That Stuck Just Quietly Expired
A Massachusetts jury cleared Karen Read of murder, manslaughter, and leaving the scene. The only count that stuck was a misdemeanor OUI, and its one-year probation term quietly ran out on June 18, 2026. Here is why the charge nobody remembers is the one that mattered.
Refusing a Breathalyzer Is Now Its Own Crime in Florida, First Offense Included: Trenton's Law and the Suppression Fight Already Brewing
As of October 1, 2025, refusing a breath or urine test after a Florida DUI arrest is a crime on the very first offense, not just an administrative license matter. Here is what Trenton's Law changed and the three suppression arguments defense attorneys are already raising in 2026.
Hunter v. United States Just Punched a Hole in Every Plea-Deal Appeal Waiver: The New 'Miscarriage of Justice' Exception Explained
On June 18, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that a federal appeal waiver cannot be enforced when doing so would leave in place an egregious error that brings the justice system into disrepute. Here is what Hunter v. United States changes for anyone weighing a plea deal.
The HALT Fentanyl Act Made an Entire Class of Drugs Schedule I Forever. The 10-Year Mandatory Minimum Almost No One Saw Coming
On July 16, 2025, the HALT Fentanyl Act permanently placed an entire class of fentanyl-related substances into Schedule I. The structural change matters more than the headline: prosecutors no longer have to prove a specific compound is a controlled drug, and 100 grams of a mixture now carries a 10-year federal mandatory minimum.
Supreme Court Tosses Twitter-Saudi Spy Conviction Over Where He Was Tried: Under Abouammo, Section 1519 Venue Follows the Lie, Not the Investigation
A former Twitter employee paid roughly $300,000 to feed dissident data to a Saudi official just had a federal conviction thrown out 9-0. The Supreme Court did not rule on his guilt. It ruled on geography, and the decision protects every federal defendant from being charged in a prosecutor's home district.
Your 2027 Car May Refuse to Start If It Decides You're Drunk. NHTSA Just Admitted No System Actually Works Yet
Federal law tells NHTSA to mandate built-in impairment detection in new cars. In a 2026 report to Congress, the agency conceded no production technology can reliably do it. For DUI defendants, the bigger question is what happens to the data when one of these sensors logs a reading.
Virginia's Clean Slate Law Starts Sealing Convictions July 1. The Same Day, Your Criminal Record Goes Online Statewide
On July 1, 2026, Virginia begins sealing actual criminal convictions for the first time. The same day, the State Police puts criminal history records online for instant download. Here is who qualifies, who is left out, and why the timing raises the stakes for everyone.
Chatrie v. United States Could End Geofence Warrants: Why the Supreme Court Is About to Decide If Police Can Dragnet Everyone Near a Crime Scene
The Supreme Court will rule by late June 2026 on whether police can use geofence warrants to sweep up every phone near a crime scene. Here is what Chatrie v. United States means for your Fourth Amendment rights.
Case v. Montana Hands Police a New Way Into Your Home Without a Warrant or Probable Cause
On January 14, 2026, a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that police can enter a home without a warrant under the emergency-aid exception based only on an objectively reasonable belief that someone inside is seriously hurt or in danger. Probable cause is not required. Here is what the decision says, why defense lawyers fear it for DUI and welfare-check cases, and how to challenge an entry dressed up as a rescue.
Culley v. Marshall Said No Prompt Hearing Required. State Legislatures Are Saying Otherwise in 2026.
After the Supreme Court ruled in Culley v. Marshall that no prompt post-seizure hearing is constitutionally required, Washington, Colorado, Oklahoma, and other states moved to guarantee one anyway. Here is what the new laws mean for defense lawyers and owners.
Counterman's Recklessness Standard Is Killing Social Media 'True Threat' Prosecutions: Why Posts Defendants Never Read Their Audience Aren't Crimes
After Counterman v. Colorado, prosecutors must prove a defendant consciously disregarded the risk a post would read as a threat. On broadcast platforms, that proof is collapsing.
Smith v. Arizona Is Killing DUI Blood Tests: Why Surrogate Lab Analyst Testimony Is Getting Suppressed in 2026
The Supreme Court's 2024 ruling in Smith v. Arizona closed a Confrontation Clause loophole that prosecutors had used for over a decade to introduce blood-alcohol results without the analyst who ran the test. Two years on, the fallout is reshaping DUI suppression practice.
Lange v. California Is Finally Killing Warrantless Home Entry for DUI: Why Misdemeanor Hot-Pursuit Suppressions Are Surging in 2026
Five years after the Supreme Court rejected categorical hot-pursuit entry for misdemeanors, state high courts are finally applying the rule. Pennsylvania's 2025 Hunte decision shows where DUI suppression motions are winning, and how bodycam timestamps have become the decisive evidence.
Drug-Induced Homicide Charges Are Exploding in 2026: Why Sharing a Single Fentanyl Pill Now Triggers a Murder Indictment
Prosecutors across the country are increasingly using drug-induced homicide and 'death by distribution' statutes to charge friends, partners, and co-users who handed over a single fentanyl pill. Here is how the laws work, why federal causation doctrine is the central battleground, and what defendants need to know.
Snyder v. United States Two Years In: Why Federal § 666 Bribery Cases Against State and Local Officials Are Collapsing
Two years after the Supreme Court's 6-3 Snyder decision, district courts are vacating § 666 bribery counts and forcing DOJ to rebuild public-corruption cases. Here is what changed, why the ComEd Four got a partial retrial, and what defendants charged under federal bribery laws should be filing in the next 30 to 90 days.
Rahimi One Year Later: How Domestic Violence Gun Surrender Orders Are Still Getting Reversed on Procedural Grounds
One year after the Supreme Court upheld the federal ban on gun possession for people under domestic violence protective orders, defense lawyers are still winning as-applied challenges. The reason: most state protective-order forms never memorialize the findings Rahimi actually required.
Field Sobriety Tests Were Never Validated for Cannabis: Why DRE Officer Testimony Is Getting Tossed in 2026
The 12-step Drug Recognition Expert protocol was built for poly-drug roadside triage in the 1970s and 80s and never validated against a cannabis impairment threshold. NHTSA admits it in writing. State v. Moore, Williams v. State, and the April 2026 DOJ rescheduling order give the defense bar a deep Rule 702 playbook for attacking cannabis DUI cases in 2026.
Clean Slate Goes Automatic in 2026: How Felony Records Are Getting Sealed Without Anyone Filing a Petition
Fourteen states and DC now seal eligible criminal records without a petition. Here is how the automation works, what it misses, and why your old plea language still controls the outcome.
Barrett v. United States Was Not About Felon-in-Possession: The Real Status of § 922(g)(1) After January 2026
Many federal defenders heard that Barrett v. United States would force the Supreme Court to decide felon-in-possession challenges by June 2026. That is not what Barrett decided. Here is the actual landscape for § 922(g)(1) cases.
AI-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Material Is Now Being Charged Federally: Why the First Conviction Will Set Precedent
The Justice Department has begun prosecuting entirely AI-generated child sexual abuse material under a hybrid charging theory that pairs 18 U.S.C. 2256 with the PROTECT Act's obscenity statute. The first federal conviction will likely set the constitutional baseline for every case that follows.
Roadside Cannabis Testing Has No Legal Limit: Why DUI-D Cases Are Falling Apart After the Schedule III Move
After the DEA's April 2026 rescheduling of FDA-approved and state-licensed medical marijuana to Schedule III, defense lawyers are dismantling DUI-drug prosecutions built on per se nanogram thresholds, roadside oral-fluid screeners, and DRE testimony that cannot distinguish week-old metabolites from active impairment.
Deepfake Evidence in Criminal Court: What Defense Lawyers Are Filing Before Federal Rule 901(c) Takes Effect
The amended Federal Rule of Evidence 901(c) is not yet in force, and the earliest possible effective date is December 1, 2027. Defense lawyers are not waiting. Here is what they are filing now under existing Rules 901, 702, and 403, and how the pending rulemaking is already shifting the gatekeeping standard.
Luigi Mangione's Federal Death Penalty Case: Why a Manhattan Jury Will Never Vote on Execution
A January 30, 2026 ruling by Judge Margaret Garnett and the Justice Department's decision not to appeal mean a Manhattan federal jury will never deliberate on whether Luigi Mangione lives or dies. The capital count fell on the elements, not the evidence.
Marijuana Just Moved to Schedule III. Here Is Why It Will Not Erase a Single Conviction or Drop a Single Charge
The April 2026 order moving FDA-approved and state-licensed medical marijuana to Schedule III is narrow and forward-looking. It does not expunge convictions, drop pending charges, or lower the quantity-based mandatory minimums in federal trafficking law.
United States v. Hemani: Why the Justices Sound Ready to Strike the Gun Ban on Marijuana Users
The Supreme Court heard United States v. Hemani on March 2, 2026, and a majority of justices sounded skeptical of the federal law that bars drug users from owning firearms. Here is what 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3) actually prohibits, how the case reached the Court, and what a ruling could mean for defendants charged with possessing a gun while using a controlled substance.